RESEARCH
Ten Common Orthopaedic Procedures Under Scrutiny: Does Lack of Randomized Trials Mean There is No Evidence ?
This analysis revisits a controversial BMJ umbrella review suggesting limited high-quality evidence for many common orthopaedic procedures. Ethical and methodological challenges in conducting surgical RCTs are explored, alongside the potential value of observational studies. Emphasis is placed on patient-centered decision-making and clinical nuance. With guest contributions from Dr. Bheeshma Ravi and Dr. Mark Pahuta, the discussion highlights the complexity of defining surgical value in modern orthopaedic practice.
Already have an account? Log in
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
