To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Full-Endoscopic Vs Tubular-Based Microscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2024

Full-Endoscopic Vs Tubular-Based Microscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Vol: 306| Issue: 4| Number:27| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of full-endoscopic and tubular-based microscopic decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Eur Spine J . 2023 Aug;32(8):2736-2747.

Contributing Authors:
V Kotheeranurak T Tangdamrongtham GX Lin W Singhatanadgige W Limthongkul W Yingsakmongkol JS Kim K Jitpakdee

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were randomized to receive either full-endoscopic decompression (FE; n=30) or tubular-based microscopic decompression (TM; n=30). The primary outcome of interest was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included ODI scores at all other time points, leg, and back pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Euro-QoL 5-Dimensions (EQ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue