To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Transcutaneous Neuromodulation on Abductor Muscles Electrical Activity in Chronic Low Back Pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2024

Transcutaneous Neuromodulation on Abductor Muscles Electrical Activity in Chronic Low Back Pain

Vol: 306| Issue: 5| Number:22| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Neuromodulation on Abductor Muscles Electrical Activity in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial.

J Pain Res . 2023 Jul 24:16:2553-2566.

Contributing Authors:
JC Benitez-Marti­nez B Garcia-Haba S Fernandez-Carnero D Pecos-Martin EA Sanchez Romero F Selva-Sarzo JN Cuenca-Zaldivar

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty-one patients with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomized to receive either a magnetic particle tape (MPT; n=21) or a sham magnetic particle tape (SMPT; n=21). The primary outcome of interest was the improvement in muscle strength of the Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Lata measured via the Hip Stability Isometric Test (HipSIT) with a hand-held dynamometer and surface electromyog...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue