To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2014

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures

Vol: 3| Issue: 7| Number:60| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Operative versus nonoperative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures

Orthopedics. 2014 May 1;37(5):e410-9

Contributing Authors:
Z Mao L Zhang X Zeng S Chen D Liu Z Zhou P Tang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Six randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis investigating the efficacy between operative and nonoperative treatment for complex 3- and 4-part humeral fractures. Overall, outcomes were similar between operative and nonoperative treatment, with few differences noted in functional outcome up to 24 months. Operative management required more additional surgery than did nonoperative...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue